Search for: "SANDERS v. THE UNITED STATES et al" Results 41 - 60 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
Only a few states allow retail stores or farmers’ markets to sell raw milk, while others restrict sales to on-farm purchases, or ban raw milk altogether (Oliver et al, 2009). [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am by bndmorris
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 59. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Although some causal claims may be supported by strong evidence of a biological process with mechanistic evidence, such claims are not common in United States tort litigation. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Robert Liles
Simply stated, Civil Investigative Demands used in False Claims Act investigations are essentially subpoenas authorized under 31 U.S. [read post]