Search for: "STATE EMPLOYEES v. Personnel Bd."
Results 41 - 60
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Protection Bd., #15-3152, 2016 U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 8:07 am
Matheny v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:00 am
(see CPLR 217[1]; see also Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 NY2d 832, 834 [1983]). [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:06 am
”Citing Steele v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:26 am
Wisconsin Bd., 351 U. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
Cleveland Bd. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:08 pm
Cleveland Bd. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Judicial deference to PERB’s expertise in providing a remedy after it sustains an improper employer practice charge is not absoluteTown of Islip v New York State Pub. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 7:16 am
Labor Relations Bd. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 6:56 am
Mendel v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 5:21 am
Local 1000 AFSCME AFL-CIO v New York State Pub. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
See Bd. of Trade of City of Chicago v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
Labor Code section 3208.3, subdivision (h), states that an employer is not required to compensate an employee for a psychiatric injury substantially caused by a lawful, nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel action. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
After considering evidence about a conversation that husband purportedly had with one of its employees, the Office of Personnel Management affirmed, stating that husband could have elected to receive a reduced lifetime annuity with survivor benefits for a new wife only by notifying OPM of his intentions in a signed writing within two years of his marriage, 5 U.S.C. 8339(k)(2)(A). [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (Board) found a violation of the employee protection provision of the Wendell H. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
" (citation omitted)];Matter of Kittredge v Planning Bd. of Town of Liberty, 57 AD3d 1336, 1339 [2008] ["In construing a statute, a court must attempt to harmonize all its provisions and to give meaning to all its parts, considered as a whole, in accord with legislative intent. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:10 am
The Appellate Division ruled that Berrios was terminated while serving as a probationary employee and such personnel may be terminated at any time during the probationary period without being given a reason and without a hearing.** Another element in this case concerned so-called “Jarema Credit. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:41 am
No. 6 of Towns of Islip & Smithtown v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 35 NY2d 371, the Appellate Division rejected this defense as well, commenting that “Contrary to the defendants' contention, an action commenced pursuant to Civil Service Law §102(2) is an action ‘to vindicate a public interest’ to which the notice of claim requirement in Education Law §3813(1) does not apply. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:14 am
View the Head Order in “Virginia State Bar EX REL, Second District Committee v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The court in Katz relied on Bell v. [read post]
