Search for: "STATE ex rel. v. ROSS." Results 41 - 60 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
19 May 2008, 4:56 pm
Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment with Class Action Allegations Appeals State of Ohio ex rel. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm by Dawn Goulet, Associate
  Although the California Supreme Court noted that its decision in People ex rel. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Olivier Moréteau
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Olivier Moréteau
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
In Ms Treena McIntyre v That’s Life, the complaint concerned payment to a relative of a convicted criminal for an article headlined “A moment of madness“, published in January 2013. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Union of India [pdf], where the Indian Supreme Court ruled that political candidates and relatives right to privacy bars disclosure of their source of income. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm by Schachtman
The 5 supposedly represented the relative risk of asbestos exposure alone in insulators who did not smoke; the 10 supposedly represented the relative risk of smoking alone in the non-insulator general population of smokers; and the 50 represented the relative risk of insulators who had smoked. [read post]