Search for: "STATE v. MCKENZIE" Results 41 - 60 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 6:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
[This is the third installment in a three-part series on the Guest-Post:  States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration:  AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:25 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kowalski, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 700 (19 March 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Reynolds v Stone Rowe Brewer (a firm) [2008] EWHC 497 (QB) (18 March 2008) Geniki Investments International Ltd. v Ellis Stockbrokers Ltd [2008] EWHC 549 (QB) (19 March 2008) Al-Rawas v Pegasus Energy Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 617 (QB) (08 April 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Wells v Pilling Parish Council [2008]… [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:58 am by Yishai Schwartz
Following the events of Nov. 13 summarized in the last post in this series, the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri reconvened on Tuesday, Nov. 14 to continue testimony and the “preadmission” of evidence relating to physical evidence from the site of the attack on the USS Cole, identified as Appellate Exhibit 207. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am by Howard Friedman
It also held that RLUIPA does not authorize damage claims against officials in their individual capacities.In United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Emily Dai
Timothy Edgar discussed how judges should follow the technical approach laid out in Van Buren v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  Some of them become the vexatious litigants-in-person, or ‘professional’ McKenzie Friends of nightmares. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:30 am by Victoria VanBuren
  [This is the second installment in a three-part series on the Guest-Post:  States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration:  AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:26 pm by Jon Sands
  African Americans are under 6% of the population but an absolute disparity, as laid down in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Stanton v Board of Trustees, 157 AD2d 712, the court commented that Stanton failed to demonstrate that the appointing authority "made no independent appraisal and reached no independent conclusion”, quoting Matter of Kilgus v Board of Estimate of City of N.Y., 308 NY 620.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2017/2017_08385.htmClick here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Discipline Book concerning… [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Stanton v Board of Trustees, 157 AD2d 712, the court commented that Stanton failed to demonstrate that the appointing authority "made no independent appraisal and reached no independent conclusion”, quoting Matter of Kilgus v Board of Estimate of City of N.Y., 308 NY 620.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2017/2017_08385.htmClick here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Discipline Book concerning… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm by A
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
  This week, in State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:23 am by familoo
” The McKenzie friend in RP v Notts was of course John Hemming MP. [read post]