Search for: "STATE v. SETTLE II"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
In general, this means that a person will be ordinarily resident in the place which he has adopted voluntarily and for settled purposes as part of the regular order of his life for the time being: R v Barnet London Borough Council, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:28 am
Moreno (Sonic II) has retreated from its earlier holding in Sonic–Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Martin Act Claims Arising Out of Stock Spinning In the Late 1990s In 2006, the New York State Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:48 am
, Part II, s 11; see also Redmond v.. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:05 pm
(See Zuckerman v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
The first such case was decided in 2012 by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Humana Medical Plan and Humana Insurance Company v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
But the most well-known case that stands for the same proposition is the one that settled the 2000 presidential election: Bush v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 6:33 pm
See EEOC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 6:00 am
App’x 829, 831 (2d Cir. 2020) (Saada II). [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:49 am
Harding v Wealands [2007] 1 AC 1, under the pre-existing English rules of applicable law). [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:20 am
The blog is delighted to host an online symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 4:28 pm
The AMR complaint was settled and no decision was issued. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 12:33 am
Local 5 v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
II, defined to include “all persons who can be said to hold an office under the government” in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
The justices did not settle on some sort of Solomonic split: for example, holding that the government could deny entry to aliens with non-immigrant visas but must admit aliens with immigrant visas. [read post]
