Search for: "STRAND v. US " Results 41 - 60 of 639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Marshall discussed the sale of genuine goods with the barcoded data removed constituted a trade mark infringement in the US, reviewing Davidoff's successful COOL WATER action against CVS (here) and the bizarre manner of its expression.Dr Peter Ruess (International School of Management, Frankfurt) then examined the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling in Court C-57/08 COPAD v Dior. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
The opinion of Gorsuch J for the US Supreme Court in 303 Creative LLC v Elenis 600 US (2023) (Opinion (pdf) | Justia) has been widely welcomed on the US political right as a victory religious rights and just as broadly deplored on the US political left as a defeat for LGBTQ+ rights. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:30 am by Dan Ernst
They just aren’t the insights that conventional wisdom would have us think. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:35 am
The mother wrote at the time of Lorna’s nomination: “She believed what I was saying and was relentless in getting more information on hair strand testing and helping me challenge the results. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:40 am by Gene Quinn
While the Supreme Court has done away with the "useful, concrete and tangible result" test from State Street Bank v. [read post]