Search for: "Sanderson v. United States"
Results 41 - 47
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
United States Surgical Corp., 147 F.3d 1374, 1376 (Fed. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am
” The FTC’s “Made in USA” labeling rule will prohibit marketers from using that designation unless “1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States; 2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States; and 3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
Olah, “My Search for Carbocations and Their Role in Chemistry,” Nobel Lecture (Dec. 8, 1994), quoting George von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (N.Y. 1960); see also McMillan v. [read post]
