Search for: "Schering Corp"
Results 41 - 60
of 251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2013, 4:23 am
Cir. 1981) ("The license waives this right to judicial relief against what, but for the license, would be an infringement."); Schering Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm
737 F.Supp.2d at 922-23 (citing In re Schering–Plough Corp. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
The case is actually two cases - against Merck and Schering-Plough Corp.... [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:16 pm
Schering-Plough Corp., 320 F.3d 1339, 1345 (Fed.Cir. 2003). [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
In re Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
” In re Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:03 pm
Schering-Plough Corp., 367 N.J. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:38 am
Schering Corp., 606 A.2d 1140 (N.J. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
Although several Circuit Court decisions have used the so-called “scope of the patent test” when considering whether patent settlement agreements violate the antitrust laws, including the Eleventh Circuit in litigation involving the same K-DUR patent settlement agreement (see Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 12:47 pm
Schering Corp. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
” In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:26 pm
Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm
Moreover, given the Third Circuit’s intervening standing decision in In re Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm
Moreover, given the Third Circuit’s intervening standing decision in In re Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
It turns out that Merck had a few cases to cite in support of its position, including the recent Third Circuit opinion in In re Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
District Court for the District of New Jersey's ruling against Merck on the issue of patent infringement in its suit against Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
District Court for the District of New Jersey's ruling against Merck on the issue of patent infringement in its suit against Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:14 pm
See In Re: Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:23 pm
May 16, 2012), and In Re: Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:31 pm
” Id. at 1337 (quoting Schering Corp. v. [read post]
