Search for: "Schneider v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 10:15 am by Vada W. Lindsey
In comparison, many long-term ground leases in the United States are renewable and include options to purchase. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm by Wells Bennett
  Regarding “injury,” Schneider said, the question for trial was not the kind of harm that Kiriakou’s alleged disclosures had wrought, but whether he had reason to believe that such disclosures could be used so as to injure the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 4:09 am by Stan
Here’s another one: A WTO case brought in 2007 against China’s lax intellectual property laws was won by the United States two years later. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:29 pm by Mary Whisner
The presentation will include a review of the federal court litigation filed in Seattle that eventually led to the United States Supreme Court 2006 landmark Hamdan v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
” Citing among other things to the Supreme Court’s recent decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act  (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:11 pm
Schneider successfully represented Guantanamo detainee Salim Hamdan in Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:50 pm
Evans, Addressing Default Trends in Patent-Based Section 337 Proceedings in the United States International Trade Commission, 106 Mich. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used… [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm by Schachtman
Delafontaine also has a website on the role of historians as expert witnesses in United States tobacco cases. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 5:48 am by admin
The taxpayers’ relied upon the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]