Search for: "Sellers v. Superior Court*"
Results 41 - 60
of 398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am
-Dallas 2009, pet. denied) ("In an executory contract for the sale of land, such as the contract for deed in this case, the superior title remains with the seller until the purchaser fulfills its part of the contract" and "[i]f the purchaser defaults under the contract, the seller is entitled to possession of the property. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am
-Dallas 2009, pet. denied) ("In an executory contract for the sale of land, such as the contract for deed in this case, the superior title remains with the seller until the purchaser fulfills its part of the contract" and "[i]f the purchaser defaults under the contract, the seller is entitled to possession of the property. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 3:00 am
In Cineplex v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
Superior Court ex rel Krescent, S199384 (Cal. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Milliken v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:00 pm
The Gattiscourt relied on Mid Valley Real Estate Solutions V, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:12 pm
K.H. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 3:44 pm
Duggan, LLC V. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 11:54 am
The Ontario Superior Court recently considered these legislative amendments in Parekh et al v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:51 am
Intendis, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
Implant Direct Sybron Intern. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:30 am
(Diamant v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:42 am
Sellers both of Indianapolis, Indiana. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 5:30 pm
In the case of Shirehampton Drive Trust v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Am., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:30 am
The case, Joseph v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:00 pm
The Supreme Court's decision in RAA Management v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:02 pm
After a bench trial, the lower court ruled for the defendants in Walid v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
The court found that the class, which consisted of purchasers and sellers of Elan Corporation American Depositary Receipts, satisfied the requirements of Rule 23 (a) and (b) (Kaplan v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 9:30 am
TriStar Investors, Inc. v. [read post]