Search for: "Sellers v. Tech Service, Inc" Results 41 - 60 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
SPS Technologies, Inc., 694 F.2d 505, 510 (7th Cir. 1982); see also Princo Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
   Sarah Feingold, Etsy, Inc.: Free speech—we need the internet as it is, doing pretty well. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Lisa Willmer, Getty Images: scope is too broad: supposed to be true tech services providing the pipes behind the scenes. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am by Eric Goldman
MySpace, Inc., 528 F.3d 413, 418 (5th Cir. 2008); see also Doe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Yaiguaje, 2015 SCC 42 http://t.co/TYNeEtuYL2 -> Confusion in cloud computing trade marks SoftLayer Technologies, Inc v Groupe iWeb Inc, 2015 TMOB 131 http://t.co/c0fFQl33L4 -> U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:25 am by Lara Mouritsen
  The recent decision in Call Center Techs., Inc. v Grand Adventures Tour & Travel Pub. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Aereo The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
And while that is certainly true, there is danger in over-relying on the analogies so often drawn between software and other, more-conventional products and services. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Becomes Canada’s Longest-Serving Chief Justice http://t.co/WxpKIS9o3n -> Life on the Social Media Front Line: The legal and ethical challenges facing Online Community Managers http://t.co/YD8WpEJJZj -> eBay Not Liable for Technical Glitch When Seller Doesn't Set Reserve Price — D'Agostino v. eBay http://t.co/2epESgQmu0 -> Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am by Eric
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 09 CVS 2582 (N.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Spencer: resell data: if you’re comfortable with a first party seller using the data, why not allow resale? [read post]