Search for: "Sharp v. Long et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Thus there is a long and detailed, almost over-detailed, description of the FDA's drug approval process on pages 11-14 of the government's brief. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
L&M Arts, et al., case number 3:10-cv-00953 in the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm
Katz in a widely read blog entitled Access Copyright v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm
Danielczyk, et al. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 2:52 pm
The award in that case, Poliner v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:01 am
Attorney in the case of United States v Samuel Mullet, et al, charged members of a peculiar Amish synod with hate crimes; charges that involve far more complex proofs.About two-years ago, ole Samuel Mullet [you cannot make it up] broke away from the traditional fundamentalist Christian Amish church in which he was raised, to start a renegade sect of his own in Bergholz, Ohio. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
There must not have been much lounging in a faculty lounge with Scalia, Posner, Epstein, Easterbrook, Sunstein, Stone, et al. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Swift Green Filters et al. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Swift Green Filters et al. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am
Apple Retail UK Limited, et al. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am
Apple Retail UK Limited, et al. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am
At about 12:40 p.m., Chief Justice Warren began to read his opinion for the Court in Case Number One on that Term’s docket, Oliver Brown et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
At about 12:40 p.m., Chief Justice Warren began to read his opinion for the Court in Case Number One on that Term’s docket, Oliver Brown et al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:34 am
The Brest et al. casebook does some of the best work of mixing constitutional law with constitutional history, for instance, and both Gunther/Sullivan and Stone/Seidman/et al. are terrific on references to other cases and to theoretical discussions. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:35 am
(By Supreme Court rule, any party other than the petitioner is deemed a respondent before the Court, so IMLA et al. are technically respondents supporting petitioners.) [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
Merrill et al., Eds., A Patent System for the 21st Century (National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004), pp. 25-27.What Merrill et al. said on pages 25-27 is a bit different. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am
’” Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm
Massachusetts in 1944 to Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. [read post]
