Search for: "Sharpe's Inc. v. Smith" Results 41 - 60 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Today we have a guest post (her second - she's a glutton for punishment) from fellow Reed Smith associate Danielle Devens. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
 First, a quick note on the government's new final rules regarding the religious accommodation (including its extension to some for-profit employers such as Hobby Lobby, Inc.). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
  In contrast, on Free Dominion, the second and third defendants had a post entitled “6 ways Baglow v Smith helped save the Internets! [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 The first instance decision by Tugendhat J was [2014] EWHC 1170 (QB) Vidal-Hall and Ors v Google Inc, this is part heard  8 December 2104 and resumes on 2 and 3 March 2015 before the Master of the Rols, McFarlane and Sharp LJJ. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Though it was “Switching Horses in Midstream”, Court Approves Plaintiff’s Predictive Coding Plan: In Bridgestone Americas Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
 The second session of the conference started with Christopher Sharp (Herbert Smith Freehills) taking up cudgels on behalf of the neglected, unloved subject of database right under the Database Directive. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Smith & Nephew, 2005 WL 3470337, at *5 (M.D. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Google, Inc., No. 12-57302 (9th Cir. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Seybold, and was confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada in 1983 in Smith v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:47 am by Sean Wajert
Merril Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 259 F.3d 154, 167 (3d Cir. 2001) (quoting Gen. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm by Bexis
  This argument — which failed to persuade either the Supreme Court or the Eighth Circuit on remand in Mensing, and the Sixth Circuit in Smith v. [read post]