Search for: "Simon v. Waters" Results 41 - 60 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
” At Concurring Opinions, Marco Simon describes nine “misconceptions” pervading last Wednesday’s “argument in Jam v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 2:54 am by Walter Olson
California state agency in charge of Prop 65 enforcement seeks to effectively reverse judge’s recent ruling and exempt naturally occurring acrylamide levels in coffee from need for warning [Cal Biz Lit] Prop 65 listing mechanism requires listing of substances designated by a strictly private organization, spot the problem with that [WLF brief in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Simon Bord and Katherine Thibodeau have Cornell’s preview. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” At The American Prospect, Simon Lazarus maintains that Epic Systems v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Guest Contributor
Arguably, the effect on claimants of the band of reasonable responses test has been ameliorated by decisions such as Newbound v Thames Water Utilities Ltd relying on s 98(4)(b) to emphasis the test’s practical limits:  The “band of reasonable responses” has been a stock phrase in employment law for over thirty years, but the band is not infinitely wide. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:21 am
It is written in Tractate Berakhot (translation by Maurice Simon). [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” IPSO The Sun online has agreed to publish a correction after claiming staff at Donald Trump’s golf course in Scotland deliberately cut the water supply of an elderly neighbour in order to drive her out. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The American University Law Review is proud to present its annual Federal Circuit symposium, Panel 2: TrademarksFirst Amendment Freedom of Speech and Trademarks: What Is, and What Should Be, the Relationship Between the Two? [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
Simon Malynicz QC began by setting out the approaches adopted by Arnold J in the High Court and Kitchin LJ, noting that while both undertook a survey of the ancient powers of the Court of Chancery to grant injunctive remedies, whereas Arnold J maintained a clear distinction between domestic and EU law, Kitchin LJ’s judgment involved blending the two together in arriving at his “principled basis” for making website blocking injunctions against ISPs who are aware that their… [read post]