Search for: "Simpson v. Superior Court" Results 41 - 60 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Steve Szentesi
Quebec Court of Appeal rejects BC Court of Appeal passing-on defence decisions in Pro-Sys and Sun-Rype The Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the earlier 2008 Quebec Superior Court decision in Option Consommateurs v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am by admin
Quebec Court of Appeal rejects BC Court of Appeal passing-on defence decisions in Pro-Sys and Sun-Rype The Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the earlier 2008 Quebec Superior Court decision in Option Consommateurs v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
BAP 1999), the Trustee argued that the ruling had been undermined by the Supreme Court's decision in Drye v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:08 am by Susan Brenner
This post examines a recent decision from the Superior Court of New Jersey – Appellate Division. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State applied to, or Courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:41 am by WSLL
Simpson, Burg, Simpson, Eldredge, Hersh & Jardine, Cody, Wyoming; Aaron J. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 7:41 am by Jon
The odds are not good for a judicial challenge to it, and since the decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:52 pm by Daniel S. Swinton, Esq.
The lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on May 27, 2010, by Katherine Webster, who is the niece of the late Anthony J. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bob Bourque, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP Outside counsel’s perspective: the network option is strategically important where a controversial commercial has just begun airing. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:54 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
If the spread of cheating is the corollary, we should do all we can to combat it – but understand it in those terms, and not with smug superiority. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:17 pm by The Complex Litigator
” Gore moved successfully in the superior court to have the entire complaint by Simpson stricken under section 425.16, the anti-SLAPP statute, and the Court of Appeal affirmed. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:46 am
*The court also referred to the decisions in Matter of Karp v North Country Community College, 258 AD2d 775; Matter of Rubenstein v Simpson, 109 AD2d 885; and Dow v Board of Trustees of Farmingdale Public Library, 75 AD2d 632 in support of its ruling.There are a number of variations on the right to payment for unused vacation accruals. [read post]