Search for: "Smith v. Board of Commissioners" Results 41 - 60 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2023, 9:41 am by TOTM Admin
Smith, Stephen Weissman, Chris Wilson, Jamie France, and Connor Leydecker. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:17 am by Record on Appeal
  Intervention by Imperial County, its Board of Supervisors, and the Deputy County Clerk/Deputy Commissioner of Civil Marriages Isabel Vargas was denied. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
Exhibited poor leadership.The board placed a copy of its evaluation in Fusco’s personnel file and Fusco appealed to the Commissioner. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:36 am
Smith v City of Rochester, 255 AD2d 863, however, sets out one significant exception to the general rule that eating lunch is not work. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 3:06 pm by Steven Boutwell
Juneau, and Tyler Moore Kostal On March 3, 2017, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its long-awaited opinion in the matter of Board of Commissioners of the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East, et al. vs. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 2:01 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 20/01/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Wednesday 20 July 2011, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in R v Smith which was heard on 16 June 2011. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
In Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98 the Court of Appeals said that including charges concerning performance that were addressed in a counseling memorandum was not “double jeopardy. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:26 am
”* The court, noting that “until just a few days ago, the governing law on this question had been settled in this State for going on 150 years,” citing Smith v. [read post]