Search for: "Smith v. Department of Employment" Results 41 - 60 of 711
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2020, 6:27 am by Leiza Dolghih
What will it cost me to enforce the agreement v. the benefit of enforcement? [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 9:26 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
Right to holiday pay for workers– The Court of Appeal will give its decision in Smith v Pimlico Plumbers on the extent of an employer’s liability to pay for holiday in circumstances where the individual was not paid holiday as a consequence of him being treated as self-employed. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court opined that as probationary employee, Plaintiff "may be discharged for any or no reason at all in the absence of a showing that ... her dismissal was in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of law", citing Smith v New York City Department of Corrections, 292 AD2d 198. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court opined that as probationary employee, Plaintiff "may be discharged for any or no reason at all in the absence of a showing that ... her dismissal was in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of law", citing Smith v New York City Department of Corrections, 292 AD2d 198. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Neither confusion concerning the administrative procedure nor an agency employee's incorrect information toll the running of the Statute of Limitations for filing an appeal Smith v Commissioner of Labor, 2012 NY Slip Op 05887, Appellate Division, Third Department An applicant for unemployment insurance benefits received two notices of rejecting his claim for benefits. [read post]
  The Virginia Department of Labor and Industry (DOLI) has issued a minimum wage guide for employers that includes an optional workplace posting announcing this increase. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
This issue may also arise in connection with an employee's former employer supplying information to a prospective employer of the individual in response to a request for "references" (see Buxton v Plant City, 57 LW 2649). [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:58 am by Michael Lombardino and Abby Kotun
Employers should consult with their Reed Smith attorneys for further advice regarding the impact of the Court decision on their workplace practices and what steps they should consider taking. __________________________ [1] USCIS, USCIS Statement on Supreme Court’s DACA Decision, June 19, 2020, available at https://www.uscis.gov/news/news-releases/uscis-statement-supreme-courts-daca-decision. [2] Dep’t of Homeland Sec. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 am by Susan Brenner
The Department of Justice relied “on a test set out by the” U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We agree with SDHR that petitioner failed to establish that she suffered an adverse employment action arising out of the refusal of the Rochester Police Department (RPD) to issue a smaller service weapon (see Matter of Gordon v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]