Search for: "Smith v. General District Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2021, 3:00 am
The United States Supreme Court held in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:36 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:08 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 8:32 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:53 am
In the case of Allstate Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 7:00 am
Because neither exception applied, the court concluded that the tribal court lacked jurisdiction over the water dispute and upheld the district court's dismissal of the case.The attorneys at Smith Hartvigsen were pleased to represent Mr. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm
In substance, the Supreme Court in Martinez and the appellate court in People v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 6:39 am
He sues under the First Amendment.The district court threw out the case, but the State Attorney General's office now concedes that Smith properly alleges a First Amendment claim. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:39 am
In Smith v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In Smith v. the United States, 599 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 1:16 pm
In Smith v. the United States, 599 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:12 pm
In Speedemissions, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 11:00 pm
In two (2) recent Federal Pennsylvania District Court Decisions, separate courts held that the Third Circuit’s decision in the Bane case, recognizing general jurisdiction by consent, conferred by virtue of a foreign corporation’s securing a registration to do business in Pennsylvania, remains binding. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
While all the state appellate courts and the federal district court upheld Smith’s conviction, the Ninth Circuit tossed it on the grounds that the conviction was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts, since there was “no evidence to permit an expert conclusion one way or the other. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
Dukes’ status as the premier class action decision of this past Supreme Court Term, the Court’s less publicized decision in Smith v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
The District Court then confirmed the bankruptcy court rulings and issued its own judgment in favor of Smith, in the amount of $44,292,767.33 (combining compensatory & punitive damages). [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 12:48 pm
Smith v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 8:31 am
In Smith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:26 am
Smith, the Supreme Court generally returned to the pre-1963 rule, and essentially overruled Sherbert and Yoder (with narrow exceptions that I'll bypass in this post). [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm
In substance, the Supreme Court in Martinez and the appellate court in People v. [read post]
