Search for: "Smith v. Internal Revenue Service"
Results 41 - 60
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
Despite the penetration of streaming services, music piracy is still a major problem for creators. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:41 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors, heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 1:32 am
From Monday 20 January until Thursday 23 January, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLP & Ors. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
Electronic service provider ABC Corp. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
An extension may be requested, but our understanding is that IRS internal policy is to grant just one 30-day extension per letter. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors. heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 501 U.S. 868, 878–79 (1991); Glidden Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY Opinion of the Court – 3 – (“Cornelius Property”) for sale and split the net sale proceeds; and for Husband to pay debt owed by the Shireys to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in the amount of $159,163.83. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
By email to Harris dated May 20, 2013, Frushtick advised of the need for a discounted appraisal, that without it, the nondiscounted appraisal would be used, and that his tax attorney had informed him that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) does not countenance the use ofresidential discounts for QPRTs. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
According to the Internal Revenue Service, for those who received a refund this year that refund averaged to about $3,000 per person. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
Jack, 2018 BCSC 610 where Justice Smith held that Google was not able to show that the global delisting order made against it violated its First Amendment rights in the U.S. or the core values of the U.S. or that the California order undermined the effectiveness of the Equustek order. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 9:28 am
Smith referred to a recent Ninth Circuit case, FTC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 9:03 am
Conversely, Justice Antonin Scalia’s federal-tax opinions, such as the 2,744-word opinion in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
