Search for: "Smith v. US Dept. of Justice" Results 41 - 60 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm by administrator
Dept. of Justice, Use of Force (a “Community Policing Topics” Web page) available at http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/default.asp? [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Appeals Court: Justice Dept. can use Mar-a-Lago documents in criminal probe MSN – Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 9/21/2022 An appeals court sided with the Justice Department in a legal fight over classified documents seized in a court-authorized search of former president Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, ruling the FBI may use the documents in its ongoing criminal investigation. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National Archives Asks Justice Dept. to Investigate Trump’s Handling of White House Records MSN – Matt Zapotosky, Jacqueline Alemany, Ashley Parker, and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 2/9/2022 The National Archives and Records Administration asked the Justice Department to examine Donald Trump’s handling of White House records. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As for the phrase "bear arms," the Court adopted Justice Ginsburg's definition in Muscarello v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
HHS argued that the RFRA was intended to restore the state of the law as it existed before Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 6:12 am by Dan Bressler
” “The Court explained: “Plaintiff seeks disgorgement of legal fees on the ground that L’Abbate purportedly operated under a conflict of interest, was incompetent, and was disloyal, citing to Baugher v Cullen and Dykman, LLP (173 AD3d 959, 961, 103 N.Y.S.3d 136 [2d Dept 2019]). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:23 am by Peter Mahler
Accordingly, dismissal of both the fraud and breach of fiduciary duty claims was warranted (see generally Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney Inc., 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996]). [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:16 am by SHG
Justice Mary Smith granted the application. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]