Search for: "Smith v. United States Department of Justice" Results 41 - 60 of 763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2019, 9:00 am by Andrew Hamm
On Wednesday, the justices hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm by Gabriel Chin
Nevertheless, as the briefs in Smith v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
FailingerDenying the Poor Access to Court: United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the… [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm by nflatow
by Nicole Flatow When Fifth Circuit Judge Jerry Smith asked the Department of Justice for a three-page single-spaced memo defending its support for the long-established principle of judicial review, Attorney General Eric Holder did what was asked and responded. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 11:26 am by Emanuela Tala
  The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied the requested temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, and in a case titled Fulton v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 5:57 am by Kalvis Golde
In 2013, Shelby County ended a long-standing requirement that states and counties with a history of voting discrimination get “preclearance” from the Department of Justice before changing election procedures. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:05 am by Mike Scarcella
Smith on Tuesday ordered Justice Department appellate attorneys to provide an explanation about Obama’s comments. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
  The decision came on a 7-2 vote in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:45 am by Dennis Crouch
July 22, 2020 Memorandum for the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
Or of course the society could host a series just on Jackson the Supreme Court justice, a dissenter from the infamous Korematsu v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something… [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
This morning brought decisions in both of the patent cases argued in November, with the government prevailing on the constitutional question raised in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]