Search for: "Smith v. United States Navy"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
Part I begins by placing the Administration’s proposal in context with the authority the Administration already claims under color of Article II of the Constitution of the United States as well as the 2001 AUMF directed at al Qaeda. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
Behold United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
United States - 4/28/14. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
” Next up is likelihood of success on the merits: Judge Leon reviews the metadata program through the prism of a subjective expectation of privacy (think Katz), rather than a physical intrusion (United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:23 am
” Third, the court relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
This week at the NMCCA: The Navy-Marine Corps CCA will hear oral argument in one case this week, on Thursday, August 30, 2012: United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm
The great object [of the statute]… was to protect the merchant vessels of the United States and their crews from piratical aggressions. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:57 am
United States, 536 U.S. 1014 (2002). [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
United States and its progeny. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:17 pm
New Yorker has a piece on United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:42 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Like the United States Supreme Court, there are few cases the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is required to hear; instead, the court decides, at its discretion, which appeals from the intermediate appellate courts it wants to hear. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
The Court first pointed to Department of the Navy v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
United States (09-1298); Boeing Company v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
The cases involved a man and a woman who had been dismissed by the Royal Air Force and 2 men who had been dismissed by the Royal Navy for being homosexual (see, respectively, Smith And Grady v United Kingdom and Lustig-Prean and Beckett v UK; also, the 2002 case of Beck, Copp and Bazeley v UK). [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:09 pm
The United States Navy, and its private contractor shipyards, had a seemingly endless appetite for amosite, in the form of blankets, and later in the form of pre-molded pipecovering insulation (such as Unibestos). [read post]
