Search for: "Software Research, Inc. v. Developer Express Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
Oracle USA, Inc. v Rimini St., Inc, 2014 WL 576097 (D. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:04 am
In a big data analysis of provisional application quality, focused on comparing provisional application content to non-provisional claims using Innography®, LexisNexis® PatentAdvisor®, and self-developed software, I found that many patent attorneys seemingly do rely rather extensively on their provisionals. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 2:27 pm
Compare, e.g., Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:22 am
Feb. 23, 2009). http://tinyurl.com/24fbolj Independent Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:59 am
Aqua Connect, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Perma Research & Development v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
" Bandag, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Pro-Football, Inc (The IP Factor) (TTABlog) Brazil gets closer to listing US IP retaliation targets (IP tango) Global Global - General Why the lack of ACTA transparency is not standard (Michael Geist) WIPO, a (rare) profitable UN agency, ventures into world of donors (IP Watch) WIPO Director wraps up official visit to India topped by meeting with Prime Minister (WIPO) Delegates look to April for consensus on development agenda coordination (IP Watch) International… [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:44 am
And the Kentucky district court in Static Control Components, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am
Moreover, although the federal counterpart does not contain such an express requirement, the trend in federal courts in California appears to be to extend it to DTSA claims as well (See, e.g., AlterG, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Everett, MA; Andrey Cunha, President) Argo Express, Inc. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
American Express. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:33 am
Viacom International Inc., v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 11:26 am
Cohen v Apple, Inc, 46 F. 4th 1012 (4th Cir. 2022), Certiorari denied 143 S.Ct. 2513, U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:01 pm
(See, for example, Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
Mastercard Inc.; 7:21-cv-10180, Kenter v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
Mastercard Inc.; 7:21-cv-10180, Kenter v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
Instead of NEP or PAE, the study uses the expression 'patent monetization entity' (PME), defined as 'one whose primary focus is deriving income from licensing and litigation, as opposed to making products' [Merpel suspects that this definition may be too broad, as it also encompasses entities whose primary focus is upon licensing due to the fact that their core activity is not the manufacture of new products, but the research and development of new technologies -… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
