Search for: "Sparks v. U.s.*" Results 41 - 60 of 154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
The show of aggression against a crowd of largely peaceful protesters sparked outrage and widespread condemnation. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am by Robert Chesney
When the scope of the interstate commerce authority expanded during World War II, with the Supreme Court’s 1942 Wickard v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The second article of the House’s impeachment resolution charges President Trump with obstruction of Congress. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
In Thomas v Brown and Tennant [1997] FCA 215, the Federal Court of Australia ultimately found that Mr Thomas was the author of the Artistic Work, and thus the owner of the bundle of rights subsisting in it. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:38 am
It was held that the work only needed to “possess more than a de minimis quantum of creativity”, and no copyright could be found in a work where “the creative spark is utterly lacking or so trivial as to be virtually non-existent. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
 Original works of authorship The Review Board set out that its decision was based on the “low standard of copyrightability” set out in Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service Co., (499 U.S. 340 (1991), requiring a “minimal creative spark”). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am by Quinta Jurecic
” And indeed, reports that Trump might make such a declaration has sparked fears of authoritarian takeover by a president who wears his authoritarian impulses on his sleeve. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Kal Raustiala and Christopher Sprigman are well known as the authors of the book, The Knock-Off Economy: How Imitation Sparks Innovation (2012). [read post]