Search for: "Staff Etc. Et. Al."
Results 41 - 60
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The District staff indicated that the adoption of the resolution was exempt from CEQA. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
By Diane Kindermann, William W. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Martin, et al., New York Evidence Handbook 318 (2d ed. 2002)). [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 6:44 am
Ahora se vuelve al punto de partida (pero sin juez de la Corte en el staff). [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:25 pm
In September 2011, the ECGI organised an academic conference to identify the corporate governance research agenda of relevance to issues raised in these two Green Papers which addressed a common set of issues - shareholders, boards of directors, and gatekeepers (regulators, auditors, credit rating agencies, codes etc). [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 4:31 am
State Personnel Board et al., No. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm
., et al. was announced out of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm
., et al. was announced out of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:20 pm
Absent a strong media or public consensus about the findings, it would be a lot easier for President Nixon et al to refute them, and wriggle free of being directly implicated. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
The government has promised greater transparency in the commission process, and the establishment of additional remote sites where the trial can be viewed as well as the unprecedented same-day Internet posting of unofficial trial transcripts (from this link one must go to “Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. 2 and then to “transcripts”) are both good news in this regard. ? [read post]
7 May 2012, 9:32 am
The government has promised greater transparency in the commission process, and the establishment of additional remote sites where the trial can be viewed as well as the unprecedented same-day internet posting of unofficial trial transcripts (from this link one must go to “Khalid Shiek Mohammed et al. 2 and then to “transcripts” [Media page here, KSM et al. page here, and transcripts page here]) are both good news in this regard. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
Okay, so here’s the next installment of Mandelman’s Monthly Museletter, which I’ve decided I post whenever there are a bunch of things going on that need to be put into proper perspective, but there’s just no way I can write individual articles on each because to do so presents a serious health risk. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am
This ontology should be applied not only to what we think of as traditional law journal content, but also to “related” content — such as companion blogs, video, data, etc. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:26 am
A related reason to be skeptical of Winston et al. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:16 pm
See, e.g., Bryant-Kutcher et al, Taxes and Financial Assets: Valuing Permanently Reinvested Foreign Earnings , National Tax Journal (arguing from a corporatist position that the US worldwide tax system 'forces' companies to reinvest in financial assets, which really isn't good for their businesses). [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 11:14 am
Second, came Seriously Gamifying Legal Learning, David Johnson & Tanina Rostain, and first the Apps for Justice -- Ron Staudt et al. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:39 pm
§ 102(a); (7) the ALJ’s finding that claims 34-35 and 38-39 of the ‘614 patent are not obvious in view of the ‘767 patent and the Sakata et al. prior art reference under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:15 pm
Smith, MD, et al., No. 09 L 12090. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:15 pm
Smith, MD, et al., No. 09 L 12090. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:00 am
Central DuPage Hospital, et al., No. 06 L 448. [read post]
