Search for: "State Bar of Michigan v. Block" Results 41 - 60 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2019, 1:44 pm by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
” *Special thanks to Rachel Park, Law Clerk and District of Columbia Bar license pending, for her assistance in preparing this post. [1] Rose v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court provides an answer by creating a multi-part test drawn from state-action cases that the Court has issued over the decades.The case is Lindke v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
Schools most likelty to be harmed include Howard, Oklahoma, Miami, Michigan State, Hastings, Lewis & Clark, Pittsburgh, and Case Western.2. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
Schools most likelty to be harmed include Howard, Oklahoma, Miami, Michigan State, Hastings, Lewis & Clark, Pittsburgh, and Case Western.2. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
”  But just as states had set the bar to recovery low before Sullivan, they also have the power to raise that bar should there be an “after Sullivan. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:37 pm by WIMS
      The Appeals Court said, "We hold that the petition is ripe, because if the certification was waived, then the pendency of the State proceeding is no bar to the Commission acting on Alcoa Power's licensing application. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Smith of Jenner & Block, who argued and won Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:03 am by Susan Brenner
As I explained in an earlier post, the federal system and all the states have rules that bar the admission of hearsay evidence unless it falls within one of several recognized exceptions to the rule barring its use. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:02 am by Antitrust Today
Heald, struck down laws in New York and Michigan which discriminated against direct shipments from out-of-state producers in favor of those in-state. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:53 am by Amy Howe
United States and Zivotofsky v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:58 am by Lyle Denniston
  Two of the cases — Michigan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
The Michigan Supreme Court took this stance regarding an attorney in a publicized criminal trial, Peisner v. [read post]