Search for: "State Bd. of Control v. Superior Court" Results 41 - 60 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am by Eugene Volokh
Gray appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court affirming the Department of Public Safety's denial of Gray's application for a professional investigator license based on posts and comments that Gray made on social media, using an account bearing the name of his out-of-state private investigation business, concerning a Maine State Police lieutenant. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am by Vercammen Law
The court found that Michael's opinion was contradicted by decedent's medical records and the testimony of her physician, who stated that decedent was in full control of her faculties during an examination on the day that she executed the 2015 Will. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Court reversed the Kern County Superior Court’s judgment dismissing the action after that court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend based on the asserted res judicata effect on an earlier Alameda County Superior Court judgment. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am by Dianne Saxe
  Pursuant to a Court Order dated February 5, 2009, t [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:43 am by Richard Renner
There, the Court held that nuclear whistleblowers were not protected when they raised safety concerns to their superiors. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
Bd. of Review, 235 A.3d 278 (Pa. 2020), held that that was NO driver control or independence for Uber drivers. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am by Richard Hunt
Other tenants, including disabled tenants who get a paycheck from an ordinary business, are no more able to control their payday than disabled tenants receiving SSDI. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Most, if not all, states have theft laws that substantially track the Model Penal Code. [read post]