Search for: "State Ex Rel. Ross v. Ross" Results 41 - 60 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
The Court then turns to whether Plaintiffs proved that those forms of injury are fairly traceable to Secretary Ross’s decision to add the citizenship question to the 2020 census and whether they are redressable by a favorable decision. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Olivier Moréteau
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Olivier Moréteau
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
19 May 2008, 4:56 pm
Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment with Class Action Allegations Appeals State of Ohio ex rel. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm by Dawn Goulet, Associate
  Although the California Supreme Court noted that its decision in People ex rel. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
In Ms Treena McIntyre v That’s Life, the complaint concerned payment to a relative of a convicted criminal for an article headlined “A moment of madness“, published in January 2013. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Union of India [pdf], where the Indian Supreme Court ruled that political candidates and relatives right to privacy bars disclosure of their source of income. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm by Schachtman
The 5 supposedly represented the relative risk of asbestos exposure alone in insulators who did not smoke; the 10 supposedly represented the relative risk of smoking alone in the non-insulator general population of smokers; and the 50 represented the relative risk of insulators who had smoked. [read post]