Search for: "State ex rel. Holmes v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
” In context, this word generally (as in Articles I and II) means a state’s lawmaking system—as the Supreme Court has repeatedly held in a century-old line of cases from Ohio ex rel Davis v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am by David Smith
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am by David Smith
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
We know that the original electorate was remarkably restricted at the time, even if it would become more inclusive relatively early in the 19th century. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Tordenti, 211 A.3d 1, 15 n.16 (Conn. 2019) (alterations in original) (quoting J.S. ex rel. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]