Search for: "State in Interest of Et"
Results 41 - 60
of 8,653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:04 am
Code, § 4060 et seq. does not impede the ability of a party to obtain a medical-legal evaluation or consultation at their own expense or impact the admissibility of such evaluation in proceedings before the WCAB (Lab. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Jorge Alcarez, et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 10:39 am
§ 2331 et seq. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:11 am
Read, Bucsuházy, Kateřina, et al. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:22 am
How high are markups in the United States? [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:41 pm
Palkon et. al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
Cir. 1973) (holding that Section 6(g) “empowered [the FTC] to promulgate substantive rules of business conduct”); United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm
United States, I find myself somewhat at a loss as to what points to focus on here. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
ET, and various preliminaries preceded the actual vote. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm
(Stay Pending Appeal; Public Interest) Martin v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
However, conflicts of interest, a lack of transparency, and various forms of opportunistic behavior in some pre-packs have raised concerns about their desirability. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
Nguyen, Alex, et al. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
Code §§ 66000 et seq.), and only DIFs that were “imposed neither generally nor ministerially, but on an individual and discretionary basis” could invoke the Takings Clause embedded in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.[2] This limitation on developers’ ability to utilize the Takings Clause meant that courts would not apply the “Nollan/Dolan test” to DIFs generally applicable to a broad class of property owners pursuant to… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Justice Barrett, writing for the Court, noted that the Court’s state action jurisprudence has largely focused upon “whether a nominally private person has engaged in state action,” not whether a state official had acted as a private citizen rather than a state actor. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
It has something to interest everyone, from addressing the use of U.S. person query terms to formalizing oversight measures to a technical expansion of the type of service provider that can be compelled to help the U.S. government acquire communications. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 4:30 am
On Friday, April 19, at Noon ET, The Employer Handbook Zoom Office Happy Hour will return on April 19, 2024. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Other scholars have argued that the parties advising institutional investors have a vested interest in maintaining inefficient practices. [read post]
