Search for: "State of Indiana v. Adams"
Results 41 - 60
of 242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:08 am
Hyatt, in which the justices considered whether to overrule a precedent that allows a state to be sued in the courts of another state without its consent. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 8:43 am
Indiana Took His $42,000 Land Rover,” written by Adam Liptak and published by the New York Times on June 25, 2018. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:00 am
Adam Thimmesch (Nebraska), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis) & David Gamage (Indiana), Wayfair: Marketplaces and Foreign Vendors, 90 State Tax Notes 111 (Oct. 8, 2018): This is the third of a series of essays wherein we analyze the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2018, 12:10 am
Adam B. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:36 pm
” In today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin has an article headlined “Supreme Court Poised to Rule Against Excessive State Fines; In Timbs v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
Indiana, in which the justices considered whether the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
Indiana, in which they will consider whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states, noting that “Timbs’ appeal to the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:06 am
The first state law allowing sterilization of people with disabilities was passed in Indiana in 1907, to prevent “…the procreation of confirmed criminals, idiots, imbeciles, and rapists. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Despite the inappropriateness of considering the Bazemore precedent after the Court decided Daubert, many lower court decisions have treated Bazemore as dispositive of reliability challenges to regression analyses, without any meaningful discussion.11 In the last several years, however, the appellate courts have awakened on occasion to their responsibilities to ensure that opinions of statistical expert witnesses, based upon regression analyses, are evaluated through the lens of Rule 702.12 1 Brock… [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 3:00 am
Adam B. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
” Lastly, about Ortiz v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak looks at Timbs v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
Indiana, in which the court will decide next term whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states, “gives the Supreme Court an opportunity to consider the broader injustices that occur in the name of civil asset forfeiture. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that Dassey v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 7:09 am
Finally, in late March, Texas, which had added two additional states as plaintiffs in the first amended complaint–Indiana and Louisiana–amended their complaint in Texas v. [read post]
