Search for: "State of Louisiana v. Train"
Results 41 - 60
of 336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2013, 10:09 am
Jan. 14, 2013); then a day later – Desai v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:22 am
"Could you please state in simple terms to me what they failed to train these prosecutors to do? [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 9:01 pm
Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:22 am
United States of America – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – September 5th, 2019) involves a medical malpractice claim. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
Key Precedent Louisiana ex Rel. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:31 am
Oregon’s recent amendment retains these three defenses and adds five additional categories – i) workplace location; ii) travel, if travel is necessary and regular for the employee; iii) training; iv) experience; or v) any combination of these factors as long as they account for the entire pay differential. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
In Van Horn, et al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:43 am
The case of Dugan v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 7:32 pm
Louisiana, No. 07-343, 2008 U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:13 am
Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:45 am
In the Plessy case, a man named Homer Plessy refused to give up his seat on a train in New Orleans, as he was required to do by Louisiana state law. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 8:56 am
The complaint in Schmitt v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
I am in the process of revising my admiralty syllabus, and one case that I’m going to teach next year is Kotch v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:01 am
In Re: New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation, Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana, No. 2001-5104, Div. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 2:13 am
Jennings v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 2:13 am
Jennings v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
In Becnel v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 8:02 am
Finally, parties should keep in mind that contra non valentem is a creature of state law, meaning the Louisiana Supreme Court has the final say in how the doctrine ought to be applied [read post]
