Search for: "State v. Antoine"
Results 41 - 60
of 184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 10:41 pm
As I pointed out in a prior post the 1983 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:05 am
Colombia) Philipp Janig, X v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:22 pm
While the majority of the court seemed to agree that the United State government violated the Fourth Amendment, the problem is U.S. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 5:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:49 am
In a case profiled here in October, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling this week reversing the conviction of Antoine Jones. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
You can read more about and from Antoine below.) [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am
California and in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
The Courts that have upheld warrantless GPS searches have cited the 1983 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:26 pm
In order to find that GPS devices require a search warrant the Court had to distinguish the use of GPS devices from the use of beepers in the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:52 am
In a rare unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled on January 23, 2012, in U.S. v Antoine Jones, that attaching a GPS device to a suspect’s vehicle is a search under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:15 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 1:49 pm
" Judge Sentelle was referring to the 1983 case U.S. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:55 am
Tex. 1990), aff'd sub. nom., U.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:14 am
In the United States vs. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:01 pm
In the case, called United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Philip V. [read post]
