Search for: "State v. Bias"
Results 41 - 60
of 5,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 7:04 pm
The 55-page ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 12:58 pm
Bristow v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 3:34 am
In H.S. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
From Wednesday's opinion in H.S. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
I was also counsel—though not lead counsel—in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:14 am
” “In Occidental Exploration and Production Company (OEPC) v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm
Yet, the EU standard for legal anonymisation is still hotly debated, as illustrated by the recent case of SRB v EDPS now under appeal before the Court of Justice. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 8:44 am
Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:18 am
As the actor most involved her termination, Pappas's gender-based bias cannot be ignored. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm
As Justice Brandeis wrote in his canonical concurring opinion in Whitney v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 11:20 am
Hasemann v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 7:27 am
Belden Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am
How one state's 2008 law has effectively curbed how face recognition technology is used there, perhaps creating a model for other states or Congress to follow. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am
And that assumption is necessary to defend INS v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:04 am
From Erikson v. [read post]
