Search for: "State v. Board of Valuation" Results 41 - 60 of 467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon  Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
ClientEarth wrote to members of HSBC’s board supporting the demands laid out in ShareAction’s resolution. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm by Public Employment Law Press
CVS Albany LLC et al., International Council of Shopping Centers, Inc., Stop & Shop Supermarket Company, LLC, Wakefern Food Corporation, New York State School Boards Association, New York State Conference of Mayors and Municipal Officials et al., amici curiae. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm by Public Employment Law Press
CVS Albany LLC et al., International Council of Shopping Centers, Inc., Stop & Shop Supermarket Company, LLC, Wakefern Food Corporation, New York State School Boards Association, New York State Conference of Mayors and Municipal Officials et al., amici curiae. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 4:03 am by Linda O'Brien (CCH)
Thus, the Board’s decision that the challenged claims of the patent were unpatentable was affirmed (Ethicon LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm by Holly Brezee
The company may employ a third-party valuation expert to ensure that the fair market value is accurately determined and to take advantage of the safe harbor offered under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of the United States (the “Code”). [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:35 am by Eric Goldman
Prior CCPA/CPRA Posts * Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Caroline A. Crenshaw
”[6] The shareholder vote is meant to be a key check on management, on whom investors rely to generate returns and manage risks.[7] Shareholders exchange their capital for ownership shares, and depend on a board of directors and management to represent their interests in the operation and decision-making of a corporation. [read post]
Furthermore, the board must consider the alignment of a repurchase with state laws, the company’s constituent documents and agreements, stock exchange rules and tax and accounting treatment. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:44 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Justice Masley’s valuation decision in Quattro Parent LLC v Rakib, 2022 NY Slip Op 30190(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Jan. 14, 2022] is noteworthy for two reasons. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 11:05 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Since many share repurchases are executed over time[v], company boards should be able to demonstrate intended impact with resulting price and valuation multiples as well as discussion over whether repurchase should continue; i.e. whether the repurchase program is having the desired effect. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 2:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
A recent paper highlights the extent of these D&O claim risks in the United States. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm by Lukas Gemar
Land valuations were indeterminate, with discretion given to federal boards overseeing taxation in each state. [read post]