Search for: "State v. Buckman"
Results 41 - 60
of 345
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 6:32 am
Even there, how a law review discussion of “whether preemption would apply to common law claims when the manufacturers deceived the FDA,” id. at 204, can occur without citing Buckman Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Allergan, Inc. 13-1379Issue: Whether, under Buckman Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
” Buckman would preempt any state law claims alleging that the defendant duped the FDA. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
., United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
Geier v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:30 am
The court’s decision in Elkind v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
Maybe our motto here at DDLaw should be “we read law review articles so you don’t have to. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 1:05 pm
But then come Lohr, Riegel, and Buckman. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:01 am
Rather, Shuker v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
Id. at *3 n.5.Any time courts mention private rights under the FDCA, we think back to Supreme Court’s implied preemption reasoning in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
Here are the latest four InFuse victories.Truthful v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Garcia v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 12:12 pm
Smells like Buckman preemption to us. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm
The Ninth Circuit swung mightily and missed with McClellan v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:27 am
Jan. 23, 2015) – and Florida state court – Buccelli v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:00 am
Jan. 27, 2015), and Garza v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
., v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
That doctrine comes into play when: (1) the federal plaintiff lost in state court; (2) the plaintiff complains of some injury from the state court judgment; (3) the state court judgment antedated the filing of the federal case; and (4) the plaintiff is inviting the federal court to reject the state court judgment. The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Third Circuit, and that’s where we are today: Johnson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
The case is McDowell v. [read post]
