Search for: "State v. Burford"
Results 41 - 60
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
In SKS Assocs. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:23 am
In Friedman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:23 am
In Friedman v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am
Some but not all federal courts have applied Burford abstention to dismiss the case without prejudice to re-filing in state court, in deference to state court primacy in an area of comprehensive state regulation. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 9:23 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 9:23 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:11 am
United States U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
Beye v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:34 pm
Blue Cross also makes the argument that, independent of the state action doctrine, the principles of abstention, set forth in Burford v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 5:26 pm
County of Charleston v Finish Line Foundation II, Inc. 2018 WL 3303197 (D. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
Brown (Dallas Police Chief) with Michelle Burford, Paul Butler, and an edited volume by Angela J. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 12:37 am
Court of Appeals in Friedman v Revenue Management, Inc. employed the Burford abstention doctrine to close the courthouse door to judicial dissolution proceedings even where diversity jurisdiction is present. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 2:43 pm
The New York Court of Appeals’ October 27, 2016 opinion in Justinian Capital SPC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:20 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:34 am
And even when diversity exists, courts in most if not all eleven federal Circuits routinely abstain from hearing judicial dissolution claims under the Burford abstention doctrine. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:33 pm
Burford, 848 F.2d 1441, 1453 (9th Cir.1988). [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Finally, the Court will weigh a petition from the state of South Carolina — Stewart v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:05 pm
United States, 980 F. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Issue: Whether, under Burford v. [read post]
