Search for: "State v. Caprice S. I." Results 41 - 60 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2011, 12:06 pm
Environmental Defense, 716 F.2d at 920 (quoting State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
While up at the capitol Friday on other business, I ran into some Harris County folks - including former Judge and current jail czarina Caprice Cosper, as well as Alan Bernstein and Dr. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:32 am by Steve Hall
That year, he famously wrote in dissent in Callins v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:00 am by Ken Chan
In closing, I leave you with Justice Blackmun’s dissent in Callins v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 1:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
  As I've discussed before, it's a problem (or soon to be one) in all the killing states. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am by Kedar
I’ve been looking at the data with an eye towards gleaning a patter from the Court’s decisions. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
Georgia and despite the effort of the States and courts to devise legal formulas and procedural rules to meet this daunting challenge, the death penalty remains fraught with arbitrariness, discrimination, caprice and mistake. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
The French have already discovered that the blackness of skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
It is possible that these may all be insufficient to control the caprice and wickedness of man. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
Despite the Supreme Court's 1976 ruling in Gregg v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 1:10 am
As I wrote last spring, Gonzales v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:00 am
We need to take Martha Woodmansee's focus on authorial narratives very seriously.Tyler Ochoa, Santa Clara University School of Law, What if Goldstein v. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am by Tobias Thienel
Nevertheless, where state secrets are not disclosed to a court of law because of these interests, the resulting state of affairs is ‘tantamount to a removal of the court’s jurisdiction by executive ipse dixit’ (i.e. by the executive branch’s own say-so: Devenney v. [read post]