Search for: "State v. Coughlin"
Results 41 - 60
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
[are] not within the scope of [an individual's] employment and [do] not advance the [State's] interests", citing Town of Somers v Titan Indem. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
[are] not within the scope of [an individual's] employment and [do] not advance the [State's] interests", citing Town of Somers v Titan Indem. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:11 am
Attempting to vacate a consent agreement resolving an administrative proceedingMatter of Kirk v State Bd. for Professional Med. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
An individual may not withdraw or rescind his or her resignation without the consent of the appointing authorityMatter of Lewis v State Univ. of N.Y. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:57 am
Coughlin, 854 F. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Coughlin (Tribal sovereign immunity from suit under the Bankruptcy Code) One petition for certiorari was filed on 3/28/23: Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" Citing SCS Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" Citing SCS Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 7:37 am
Coughlin, 344 F.3d 282, 291 (2d Cir. 2003). [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
** In Tulloch v Coughlin, 50 F.3d 114, the US Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, considered the differences between “absolute immunity” and “qualified immunity. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
** In Tulloch v Coughlin, 50 F.3d 114, the US Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, considered the differences between “absolute immunity” and “qualified immunity. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Addressing yet another aspect of Appeal 1, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, opined that "Contrary to [Plaintiff's] further contention in appeal No. 1, [Supreme Court] did not err in remitting the matter to [Respondents] to reconsider [Plaintiff's] request, provide a privilege log, and ultimately comply with its statutory obligations and thus any decision concerning Plaintiff's entitlement to attorney's fees are premature at… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Addressing yet another aspect of Appeal 1, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, opined that "Contrary to [Plaintiff's] further contention in appeal No. 1, [Supreme Court] did not err in remitting the matter to [Respondents] to reconsider [Plaintiff's] request, provide a privilege log, and ultimately comply with its statutory obligations and thus any decision concerning Plaintiff's entitlement to attorney's fees are premature at… [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Coughlin & Gerhart, LLP, Binghamton, NY (Paul J. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Coughlin & Gerhart, LLP, Binghamton, NY (Paul J. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
"The Circuit Court vacated the district court's judgment and remanded the matter to the lower court for further proceedings.In Rychlick v Coughlin, 99 A.D.2d 863, aff'd 63 NY2d 643, the Appellate Division opined that threatening to do what the appointing authority has a right to do – in this instance filing disciplinary charges against Rychlick if he refused to resign from his position -- did not constitute coercion so as to make… [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
"The Circuit Court vacated the district court's judgment and remanded the matter to the lower court for further proceedings.In Rychlick v Coughlin, 99 A.D.2d 863, aff'd 63 NY2d 643, the Appellate Division opined that threatening to do what the appointing authority has a right to do – in this instance filing disciplinary charges against Rychlick if he refused to resign from his position -- did not constitute coercion so as to make… [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Further, in Graham v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 1014, the Court of Appeals upheld the removal of a state correction officer following his conviction of a felony under federal law. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 6:17 am
" In 1996, the Second Circuit held in Jolly v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
Attempting to vacate a consent agreement resolving an administrative proceeding Matter of Kirk v State Bd. for Professional Med. [read post]