Search for: "State v. Direct Sellers Association" Results 41 - 60 of 383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Cavendish Square’s right not to pay the balance of the purchase price of the already purchased shares, and to pay a lower price for the to-be purchased shares, were direct consequences of the larger harm inflicted on the company, and thus the lesser value of the company to the shareholders, due to the seller’s breach of his fiduciary duty to the company. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:47 am by Josh Wright
Heald, which held that states could either allow in-state and out-of-state retailers to directly ship wine to consumers or could prohibit it for both, but couldn’t ban direct shipment only for out-of-state sellers while allowing in for in-state sellers. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:55 am
Without a showing of direct competition, the seller failed to state a claim for false advertising under the Lanham Act, according to the court.Even if a “sponsored link” might confuse a consumer, with several different sponsored links appearing on a page it was hardly likely that a consumer might believe each one was the true producer or origin of the Styrotrim product. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am by Eric Goldman
” Amazon sells direct to consumers, which is outside the scope of the trademark registration. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Kinsey Distinguished Chair in Finance at Louisiana State University; Steven Feinstein, an associate professor of finance at Babson College and the founder, president, and senior expert of Crowninshield Financial Research; and Onnig H. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:32 am by David Kravets
” Six other states and several local governments had adopted similar bans — which provide for a $1,000 fine for sellers. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:00 pm
(The Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]