Search for: "State v. Easton"
Results 41 - 60
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2022, 6:32 am
The United States v Miller’s Organic Farm and Amos Miller’s next such hearing will be on September 26 At this one, Amos Miller of Bird-in-Hand, PA must have his $305,000 fine paid up or he risks going to jail. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:19 am
Easton, Senior Assistant Attorney General. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:17 pm
Shaughnessy in Easton, Northampton County, Pennsylvania for forwarding this case to my attention. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 4:58 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:08 am
Where the complainant has registered the trademark with “the United States Patent and Trademark Office (or a comparable foreign trademark office)”, the respondent has the burden of rebutting the presumption of validity, Town of Easton Connecticut v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
Barrett v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:48 am
Easton Land & Dev., Inc., 723 F.2d 1549, 1551 (11th Cir.1984). [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 9:20 pm
Easton, was a 19th-century dispute about the ownership of a silo full of wheat. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:16 pm
Easton Enterprises, Inc., 632 F.3d 1358, 1371(Fed. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:38 pm
You can find the court’s opinion in Rosebrock v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
Easton v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm
Easton Enterprises, Inc., No. 2010-1057, -1116 (Fed. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:40 pm
Easton Area School District v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 4:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:51 pm
Supreme Court in what could be one of the major Fourth Amendment cases of the decade, U.S. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 4:15 am
Easton, Paul L. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:00 am
In R.S. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:35 am
Missouri Public Service Commission, the question is whether the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause and legal doctrine on utility rates bars a state public service agency from prohibiting a utility from recovering from its retail customers the costs of importing electric power from another state, when those transmission costs have been federally approved. ** The Court refused to hear Easton Area School District v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 6:09 am
”Based on the facts presented in the opinion, Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
