Search for: "State v. Ek"
Results 41 - 60
of 120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 8:21 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 10:15 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:59 am
Jakub Handrlica, International Administrative Law and Administrative Acts: Transterritorial Decision Making Revisited International Law and European Law Dalibor Jílek & Jana Michaličková, The Conceptual Role of Habitual Residence Solange Maslowski, The Scope and the Future of Equality of Treatment for Economically Inactive Union Citizens on the Move Václav Šmejkal, Saving EU and its Welfare States Through Disincentives to Migration? [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:03 am
Also of interest in this case is the court’s reference to Lord Sumption’s judgment in Zakrzewski v District Court in Torun, Poland [2013] UKSC 2, which stated that “as a general rule the court of the executing state is bound to take the statements and information in the warrant at face value. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Circuit’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:53 am
Yes 5-4 (ACB and the four dissenters] vs [NG, CT, EK, and SS]). [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:53 pm
France [GC] (no. 40454/07, paras. 90-93) and Perinçek v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Vathana v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:16 am
Big Tobacco is not only finding it hot in the great State of Florida, but also in the great State of Connecticut as well. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:16 am
Big Tobacco is not only finding it hot in the great State of Florida, but also in the great State of Connecticut as well. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 7:54 am
Use of Force and So-Called Islamic State Veronika Bílková, The Use of Force against the Islamic State (Jus ad Bellum Aspects) Tamás Lattmann, Questions of International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law in the Case of a Foreign Military Intervention against the Islamic State Jelena Dinic, Money Laudering as a Form of Financing Terrorism through the Prism of Terrorist Organization “Islamic State of Iraq and Levant” Human… [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 11:43 am
In Microsoft v AT&T, in 2007, the justices clarified how the statute applies when software is transmitted from the United States but copied overseas. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:16 pm
Perinçek v Switzerland (App No 27510/08)[2015] ECHR 907. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:30 pm
EK: Yes. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:17 am
Virginia, revisiting the Supreme Court's decision last term in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am
As the Court recalled in Perinçek v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:26 pm
In other words, it excludes certain conduct from the scope of protection afforded by Convention rights and thus prevents individuals from invoking the Convention in defence of such actions (see also Perinçek v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 4:49 pm
” The Court relied on Perinçek v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:35 am
The opponents argued that the signs have the same syntactical construction (THE and FACTOR) and are the same aurally, due to the sound of “pets” and “eks” s. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 3:35 am
Both courts relied on a 1997 state Supreme Court decision, Snyder v. [read post]
