Search for: "State v. Funnell"
Results 41 - 60
of 361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2008, 6:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am
MINTON v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am
MINTON v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 8:58 am
The Court of Appeals rejects that effort.The case is Garcia v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:04 pm
In Thompson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:50 am
Parker v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:07 am
On March 22, 2011, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Kasten v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:40 am
In the lawsuit United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:11 pm
In United States ex rel. et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 7:40 pm
As Judge Sack notes in his dissenting opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:02 am
Introduction States are set to receive $195.3 billion in fiscal relief under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), equivalent to 20 percent of the annual tax collections of state governments.[1] With state revenues essentially flat in 2020 (a net decline of less than 0.2 percent), the greatest challenge for states may be figuring out what to do with it. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 6:54 am
In Westwood Apex v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 9:50 am
For decades, Arlington County has been tirelessly waging a war against suburban sprawl and the impacts of funneling more and more automobile traffic from outlying suburban counties through Arlington County. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
The increase in permit fees and penalties will provide some additional funding that can be funneled directly back into wetlands enforcement. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm
Relying on United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm
Relying on United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
Keegan.This case was prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Philip V. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 3:30 pm
From today's Complaint in Biden v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm
But if the state chooses to provide a generally available scholarship program that includes religious schools, it has to include those schools without regard to religion; that’s a basic command of the First Amendment (see, e.g., Larson v. [read post]
