Search for: "State v. GC"
Results 41 - 60
of 461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2019, 10:26 am
However, it also emphasised that, even though the legalisation of cannabis for therapeutic and recreational purposes is under discussion across the EU, the consumption and use of cannabis containing THC above a stated threshold remains illegal in most EU Member States. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:02 am
Clifford v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 7:08 pm
Often, the GC does not reveal its financial state to the parties it contracts with know of its financial state until it is too late. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 2:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:25 am
Younger-Holmes Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:03 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 12:16 pm
Circuit’s holding in Penrod v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
Mark Seeleyof ElsevierCompetition v IP law: The GCs noted that they are all seeing the impact on competition issues in IP law and in their businesses. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:00 am
The recent case of Claydon v Mzuri is a particularly harsh example of the application of the prior use case law. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Wadler v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Wadler v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:55 am
Chen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:39 am
Our reports on the oral arguments from the May term of the Illinois Supreme Court continue with Lake County Grading Company, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
This Baker Donelson memo discusses Wadler v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am
This analysis is consistent with recently published decisions by both the General Court and the Boards of Appeal on the topic, inter alia: mataharispaclub v EUIPO - Rouha (SpaClubMatahari), Gugler France v EUIPO - Gugler (GUGLER), R 1320/2022-4, CELESTINO, and R 470/2023-2, TOYA (fig.).Therefore, it is crucial for bad faith applicants to prioritise thorough, high-quality evidence collection for a successful case. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
Evidence provided needs to be quantitively sufficient to prove distinctive character in the Member States concerned. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 12:20 pm
National Cable & Telecommunications Assn v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:25 am
This very question was addressed a few days ago in the judgment that the General Court (GC) rendered in Zdút v EUIPO, T-250/21 (NEHRA). [read post]
14 May 2017, 5:53 am
This is subject to the parties having been given the right to be heard on the new case law, if it is presented for the first time before the GC.This is precisely what occurred in case T-453/11, Szajner v OHMI - Forge de Laguiole (LAGUIOLE) [reported by The IPKat here]. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:32 pm
Last Thursday Advocate General (AG) Kokott handed down her Opinion in case C-104/18 P Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v Euipo (C-104/18 P). [read post]
