Search for: "State v. Harlan" Results 41 - 60 of 664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2023, 3:36 am by SHG
” The majority in Plessy v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:37 am by Michael C. Dorf
As I noted in that earlier essay, a leading opinion--Justice Harlan's dissent (only on jurisdictional grounds) in Poe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court, in one of its most historical decisions, Marbury v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Justice John Marshall Harlan I use that word in his Civil Rights Cases dissent from 1883: But what was secured to colored citizens of the United States—as between them and their respective States—by the grant to them of State citizenship? [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Thomas gave us the answer in his opening paragraph in his brutal dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
  Still, the two constructs were the tools they had to get themselves there, and they had to be used in certain ways or else appear to pass–in Mark’s words–”from lawyerly deliberation to sheer willfulness” (to quote Mark’s rendering of Harlan Fiske Stone’s verdict on Colgate v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Already by 1961, the construction of the Act to exclude otherwise-lawful medical use was so well established that Justice Harlan, dissenting on jurisdictional grounds in Poe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Although as was true with cases like United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by GSU Law Student
Illinois, an 1873 decision upholding a state’s right to exclude women from the practice of law. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 12:34 am by Orin S. Kerr
  It starts with a case on the open fields doctrine, United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Territorial Takings in the Penn State Law Review (2022):John Marshall Harlan (LC)Eminent domain is a minimal constitutional protection for private property and one that is subject to far more discretion than previously recognized by scholars. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Justice John Marshall Harlan II in Poe v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm by Samuel Bray
Professor Harrison's work was recently highlighted by Professor Amanda Frost at SCOTUSBlog as one side of a debate critical to United States v. [read post]