Search for: "State v. Hearst" Results 41 - 60 of 168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2018, 11:58 pm by Anthony Zaller
  The California Supreme Court recognized this in Dynamex, stating: As the United States Supreme Court observed in Board v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, the Court of Appeals instructs that FOIL is to be "liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:00 pm
Hearst Corp. (1969) 276 Cal.App.2d 680, where the plaintiff alleged that defective shoes caused her injuries. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 3:01 pm
Univ. of Wash., 125 Wash.2d 243, 251, 884 P.2d 592 (1994) (pluralityopinion) (quoting Hearst Corp. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:23 am by Eric Goldman
In 2013, he obtained a restraining order against some of the authors in New York state court. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
  The panel provided a brief reminder of the key UK and CJEU cases dealing with the meaning of (1) an act of “communication” and (2) a “public”, both in the context of re-transmission of broadcast signals (SGAE v Rafael Hotels Case C-306/05, SCF v Marco Del Corso Case C-135/10, ITV v TV Catchup Case C-607/11 and Reha Training v GEMA Case C-117/5) and P2P networks (Polydor v… [read post]