Search for: "State v. Jungling" Results 41 - 60 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
The whole Spanish navy could not have policed its 8,246 miles of tidal coastline, nor could the army police its 54,000 square miles of jungle and swamp. [read post]
The
20 Aug 2012, 11:24 am by Jon Sands
The dissenters wring their hands, shrug their shoulders, and say that under AEDPA the state court's ruling was not unreasonable (really).US v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
  To state a claim under the California Voting Rights Act, you've got to establish "dilution" -- which in turn means that you've got to show that a particular district would be "majority-minority" (over 50%) to prevail. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:57 am
Metzger, 152 N.J. 490 (1998) (single use of the phrase "jungle bunny" severe for purposes of establishing liability for racial harassment); Kwiatkowski v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 5:49 am
This particular case had been brought by the heirs of director John Huston, who objected to the colourisation of his film 'Asphalt Jungle'. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 7:58 pm
  On August 13, 2008, the New Jersey Appellate Division posted to its website in the "unpublished decisions" section a ruling in the case of Darren Kwiatkowski v. [read post]