Search for: "State v. Koenig"
Results 41 - 60
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2016, 4:00 am
Determining the impact of performing light, limited or restricted duty on an application for disability retirement benefits Koenig v DiNapoli, 2016 NY Slip Op 03942, Appellate Division, Third Department2 NYCRR 364.3 addresses situations in which a member of the New York Stateand Local Police and Fire Retirement System [SLPFRS] has been assigned to light, limited or restricted duty applies for disability retirement benefits. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:26 pm
” 37 C.F.R. 202.1(a); Planesi v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
Health Ctr. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 8:03 pm
Friederwitzer, supra; Alan G. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:05 am
Denisco, Intern at Volpe and Koenig, P.C. for her contribution to this post In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that Aereo Inc., (“Aereo”) was violating copyright laws in American Broadcasting Cos., Inc., et al v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:00 am
Recent posts include a summary of Exxon Mobil Corporation v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 10:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 2:59 am
On July 2, 2013, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Fresenius USA v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm
In Apollo Capital Fund LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:41 pm
Koenig and Michael L. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am
Court Rules That State Bar’s Professional Liability Fund Is NOT Subject to MMSEA Reporting Mark Popolizio, of the Crowe Paradis Services Corp. explains the case of Oregon State Bar Professional Liability Fund v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Koenig [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:25 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:52 am
An interesting decision from India has just been reported that draws attention to distinctions between UDRP and INDRP in which the respondent (petitioner in the civil proceeding) was a bulk registrant, Koenig v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:44 am
An article about the state of the Benefits Review Board has been published at LexisNexis’ Workers’ Compensation Law Community page. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:00 pm
Clarke v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:47 am
Sept. 2, 2010); and Von Koenig v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:00 am
Driscoll in Koenig v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In Koenig v. [read post]
