Search for: "State v. Link" Results 41 - 60 of 24,202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 3:26 am by husovec
These suspected failures concern, in particular the functioning of X’s “Community Notes” system, as well as the consistent application of X’s platform manipulation policy, as set out in its terms and conditions and the effectiveness of mitigation measures linked to subscription products, such as the blue checkmark”. [read post]
  “Sensitive data” is considered personally identifiable if it “identifies or is linked or reasonably linkable, alone or in combination with other data, to an individual or a device that identifies or is linked or reasonably linkable to an individual. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
 As the Board of Appeal had correctly stated, "the loss of reputation rarely happens as a single occurrence but is rather a continuing process over a long period of time, as the reputation is usually built up over a period of years and cannot simply be switched on and off [...] in addition, such drastic loss of reputation for a short period of time would be up to the applicant to prove". [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Ormondroyd Ch was unconvinced by the justification, stating: “[20]. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm by Stuart Kaplow
This post is a compilation of the environmental and sustainability legislation enacted in this session, including links to each bill. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 1973) (holding that Section 6(g) “empowered [the FTC] to promulgate substantive rules of business conduct”); United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Last October, I wrote a long post on a new Tenth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm by Adeline Chong
’[9] Between a choice of the identifying the situs as the domicile or residence of the person who controls the private key linked to the cryptoasset, the court preferred residence as being the ‘better indicator of where the control is being exercised. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
These chemicals are linked to various health concerns, including birth defects, developmental damage in children, and cancers. [read post]