Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 41 - 60
of 68,671
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
This entire talk was both inappropriate and terribly mean. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am
What does this mean for future document access requests? [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Retirement Investors For purposes of the new test, the Final Rule has added a new definition for the recipients of investment advice: Term Definition Retirement Investor a plan, plan participant or beneficiary, IRA, IRA owner or beneficiary, plan fiduciary within the meaning of ERISA section (3)(21)(A)(i) or (iii) Code section 4975(e)(3)(A) or (C) with respect to the plan, or an IRA fiduciary within the meaning of Code section 4975(e)(3)(A) or (C) with respect to the IRA. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court has gone rogue. [read post]
21 May 2024, 1:15 pm
What Does the Insurance Policy Mean? [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:55 am
They can pass the means test if their income is less than the median income in their state for a household of a similar size. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:46 am
Three Recent Unanimous Decisions In Muldrow v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:00 am
Nix v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
It stated that the documents of the EPO examination proceedings cited by the parties shed no new light on its interpretation. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm
In line with previous case law such as In ‘t Veld v Council, the Court required [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:05 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in U.S. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:03 pm
This term stated that customers must “tell us if anything changes while you’re insured with us” (the Notification Clause) (our emphasis) and was included within Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) issued with approximately 1,377,900 contracts for home and contents insurance policies. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:58 pm
In Khadr v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm
The dispute concerns the meaning of the statutory phrase “currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:52 am
Just because a software recommends rather than determines a price doesn’t mean it’s legal. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
That does not mean that it is a foregone conclusion. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:59 am
OCR noted that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
